Woodward v. Woodward: Alimony Reform Applies to Pending Cases

Published March 25, 2026 · By Christine Leonard, Esq. · Florida Bar #1001612

A Landmark Ruling on Florida’s Alimony Reform and Retroactivity

---

On January 22, 2025, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal issued a significant ruling in Woodward v. Woodward that answered a question many divorcing Floridians have been asking since the 2023 alimony reform took effect: Does the new law apply to cases that were already in progress when SB 1416 became law on July 1, 2023?

The answer, according to the 2nd DCA, is yes — if the case was still “pending” when the statute took effect, the amended law applies. This decision has major implications for anyone with a permanent alimony award that was entered before the reform but was still subject to appeal.

The Case Background

---

The Woodwards were married for 24 years before filing for divorce. After trial proceedings, the trial court entered a final judgment in February 2023 that included an award of permanent alimony to the wife — consistent with the law as it existed at that time.

Just a few months later, on July 1, 2023, Governor DeSantis signed SB 1416 into law, which eliminated permanent alimony in Florida entirely. The husband appealed the trial court’s judgment, and the case was still pending before the 2nd DCA when the new law took effect.

The Appeal and the Wife’s Argument

---

On appeal, the central question was whether the amended alimony statute should apply to a case where the trial court had already entered its final judgment before the law changed. The wife argued that the new law should not apply because the trial court made its decision under the prior version of the statute.

The husband countered that the case was still “pending” because the appeal had not yet been resolved — and the new statute, by its plain language, applies to cases “pending” as of July 1, 2023.

The 2nd DCA’s Ruling: January 22, 2025

---

The Second District Court of Appeal sided with the husband and reversed the permanent alimony award. The court held that:

• The amended statute applies to cases still “pending” on July 1, 2023, when SB 1416 took effect
• A case remains “pending” until all appellate rights are exhausted — meaning even if the trial court has entered a final judgment, the case is not truly final until any appeal is resolved
• Because the Woodward case was on appeal when the new law became effective, the amended statute — which eliminates permanent alimony — must be applied

The court remanded the case back to the trial court with instructions to reconsider the alimony award under the new statutory framework.

Additional Findings: Amount and Income Calculation Errors

---

Beyond the retroactivity issue, the 2nd DCA also identified two additional problems with the trial court’s original alimony award:

• The monthly alimony amount of $1,750 exceeded the husband’s demonstrated need. The appellate court found insufficient evidence in the record to support that level of payment based on the husband’s actual financial circumstances.
• The trial court improperly used gross income instead of net income when calculating the alimony award. Under Florida law, alimony calculations must be based on net income — income after taxes and mandatory deductions — not gross earnings.

These errors, combined with the retroactivity ruling, meant the entire alimony determination needed to be reconsidered from the ground up.

The Key Legal Principle: What “Pending” Means

---

The most significant takeaway from Woodward v. Woodward is the court’s interpretation of the word “pending.” Under this ruling, a divorce case is considered pending — and therefore subject to the new alimony statute — until:

• All trial court proceedings are complete, AND
• All appellate proceedings are resolved (or the time to file an appeal has expired)

This means that any permanent alimony award entered before July 1, 2023 that was still subject to an active appeal on that date could potentially be reversed and reconsidered under the new law.

Other Recent Florida Alimony Appeals to Watch

---

Woodward is not an isolated ruling. Other Florida District Courts of Appeal have been addressing similar questions about how the 2023 alimony reform interacts with pre-existing cases:

• Frazier v. Dodd (5th DCA, 2025) — Another recent appellate decision addressing the application of SB 1416 to cases that were in the appellate pipeline when the law changed. This case further reinforces the principle that the reformed statute applies to pending matters.
• Loconto v. Loconto (4th DCA, 2025) — A decision from Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal also examining the retroactive application of the alimony reform to cases pending on appeal. Together with Woodward and Frazier, this case demonstrates a trend across multiple appellate districts.

The fact that multiple DCAs are reaching consistent conclusions strengthens the legal argument that the 2023 reform applies broadly to cases that were not yet final when the law took effect.

What This Means for You

---

If you currently have a permanent alimony order in Florida — whether you are paying or receiving — the Woodward decision may have direct implications for your case:

• If your case was still on appeal when SB 1416 took effect (July 1, 2023): This ruling directly supports an argument that the amended statute should apply, potentially eliminating a permanent alimony award.
• If your permanent alimony order is final and no longer subject to appeal: The Woodward ruling does not automatically undo your order, but the 2023 reform provides other grounds for modification — including retirement, supportive relationships, and the new income-based caps.
• If you are going through a divorce now: Permanent alimony is no longer available. Your case will be decided entirely under the reformed statute, with durational alimony capped based on marriage length and limited to 35% of the income differential.

In all of these situations, the evolving case law makes it essential to work with a family law attorney who understands both the statute and how Florida appellate courts are interpreting it.

Frequently Asked Questions About Woodward v. Woodward

---